染雾Reflection on Twelve Angry Men
Article One: An Exploration of Justice and Prejudice
After watching the film "Twelve Angry Men," I was left with a multitude of thoughts and emotions. The movie explores the complexities of the justice system and the impact of prejudice on decision-making. It not only captivated me with its intense courtroom drama but also made me question the flaws within our society.
The film revolves around twelve jurors deliberating the fate of a young man accused of murder. As the deliberation progresses, it becomes evident that prejudice and personal biases heavily influence the jurors' initial opinions. This is particularly exemplified by Juror 10, who holds strong prejudice against the accused based on his race and background. However, as the film unfolds, it becomes clear that the evidence presented may not be as solid as it initially seemed.
What struck me the most about "Twelve Angry Men" was the exploration of the notion of justice. The film shows that justice is not always easily achieved and that it requires individuals to set aside their personal biases and prejudices. It prompts viewers to question their own biases and consider the impact they can have on their decision-making processes.
Furthermore, the film highlights the power of persuasion and effective communication. Juror 8, portrayed by Henry Fonda, challenges the group's initial verdict by presenting alternative theories and evidence. Through his calm and rational arguments, he manages to sway the opinions of his fellow jurors. This showcases the importance of open-mindedness and critical thinking in achieving justice.
"Twelve Angry Men" also portrays the significance of empathy and understanding. As the jurors begin to understand the accused's background and circumstances, their perspectives shift, leading to a more compassionate approach in their decision-making. This serves as a reminder that empathy can play a vital role in achieving justice and fairness.
Overall, "Twelve Angry Men" left me with a profound sense of reflection. It made me question the flaws within our justice system and society as a whole. The film serves as a reminder that justice is not a straightforward concept but rather a complex and delicate process. It urges individuals to examine their own prejudices and biases, encouraging a more compassionate and fair approach to decision-making.
Article Two: The Power of Dialogue and Deliberation
Upon watching the film "Twelve Angry Men," I was struck by the power of dialogue and deliberation in reaching a just verdict. The movie sheds light on the importance of open-mindedness, effective communication, and critical thinking in achieving a fair and unbiased decision.
The film portrays twelve jurors locked in a room, tasked with deciding the fate of a young man accused of murder. As the deliberation begins, it becomes evident that the jurors hold various prejudices and biases that cloud their judgment. However, through dialogue and discussion, they gradually uncover the flaws in the prosecution's case, leading to a reevaluation of their initial opinions.
What stood out to me was the significance of open-mindedness and the willingness to consider alternative perspectives. Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, challenges the group's initial guilty verdict by presenting new evidence and raising reasonable doubts. Through his calm and rational arguments, he manages to break down the barriers of prejudice and sway the opinions of his fellow jurors. This demonstrates the power of open dialogue in changing minds and achieving justice.
The film also emphasizes the importance of effective communication. Each juror brings their own experiences and biases to the table, making it crucial to express thoughts and opinions clearly. Through respectful and thoughtful exchanges, the jurors are able to challenge each other's assumptions and arrive at a more informed decision.
Furthermore, "Twelve Angry Men" showcases the value of critical thinking in the face of complex situations. As the jurors analyze the evidence presented, they question its validity and reliability. This demonstrates the power of skepticism and the need for individuals to think critically when making decisions that can impact someone's life.
The film also serves as a reminder of the responsibility we have as members of a democratic society. The jurors' deliberations reflect the essence of a fair and just legal system, where every voice is heard and considered. It highlights the importance of citizen participation and the impact it can have on shaping our society's values and principles.
In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" left a lasting impression on me regarding the power of dialogue and deliberation in achieving justice. The film highlights the significance of open-mindedness, effective communication, and critical thinking in overcoming prejudice and bias. It serves as a reminder of the responsibility we have as individuals to actively participate in the pursuit of justice and fairness.
十二怒汉观后感英文 篇三
But think about it, or only gave three stars.
Why?
Because the movie is not pure. It is the theme of too much, the amount of information you want to convey is too large, although not so difficult to understand and accept, but the actual shot out of the situation is much more confusing: the jury system questioned the original Lumet preserved, influence to the Russian Chechen War mentality is he stressed, then through to Russia's dissatisfaction with the status quo of the beginning ("streets are Mercedes BMW Audi, only three minutes walk to the theatre of the road eight"), the narrative part involved everyone when mixed with too much of everyone's personal feelings, almost everyone said a case may not have with their the relationship between the piece, and then to the case itself (because of a surge in interest related to ethnic issues ah) increased the number of suspense drama elements, and finally to a strange man fancy...... Wang Yi think that this version than the conception of Lumet high, oh, maybe, but was not everything, although Kharkov has never let his film meters out of control, but still seem messy, and the strength is a scattered, feeling no matter which themes are focused on not just skimming over the surface like this in the past. No matter - I hate conception conception is not in the way of literature to discuss the film, the film quality, whether it is the rhythm, focus, or narrative control, this is a lot less than the old version.
Then talk about technology. Whether new or old version, is a technology very good film, but the difference is that the old version of the technology, with the integration of narrative is very good, whether it is the opening track length mirror beautiful, or to enter the space after the precise positioning, had a sudden feeling, and the new version, most of the time, let the people think it is a virtuoso technique -- try a decorative. For example, 4 ed in dog holding hands through the lens, in a sense, can reduce at least once, always repeat, even the flashing lights of suspense, to finally will make people feel flat and uninteresting.
Watch this movie shows a sense, not the seafood cooked together, called sea food and poultry, or a hodgepodge.
By the way of Mikhalkov, the Slavophilism heavy director, is now famous Russian director in one of the largest, but I am not very love, because that kind of Slavic tastes! Sometimes, in order to render this complex, he is willing to destroy the whole structure of the film (Siberia barber), so that the mood itself has become an independent part of the film. When it comes to artistic conception, with the same Slavic complex than Sokolov, far worse.
十二怒汉观后感英文 篇四
I don't know when to start, when upset or depressed, I used to find old movies, especially in black and white, from which get quiet and elegant is important to me. When the movie is the movie, every word, every shot, a seamless heavenly robe.
If not a summer night, in front of the 12 inch TV "murder in the Orient Express", I am afraid I will not engage in the occupation, so Sidney Lumet on my film concept that enlightenment can be formed. Not only is my occupation, Lumet outlook on life enlightenment, than the so-called supernatural forces of evil, I fear more complex. So far, I do not dare to read the murder of the Orient Express, the original, even if I have read most of Agatha's works, for fear that the text will destroy my heart on the film version of the feelings.
"Twelve Angry Men" is a kind of courage to cash, Henry Fonda against eleven companions of courage, personal subjective experience and attitude against the truth of courage, fairness and justice against self courage, American judicial system and social harmony of confrontation, and of course Lv Mei will have the courage.
If I in twelve, I will think what what language, I am afraid that I am going with Ning Wang Zong not
paranoid, or just because the bad boy will affect the society and others, so he will be charged to preach. This is not only my own narrow, I believe this is the so-called "good man" narrow.
He is good at a single space, refining and performance in depth at mining and play on the event. "Twelve Angry Men", "summer afternoon", "Murder on the Orient Express" is a single main space, single and multi scene, closed interior, rich images may have been the maximum limit, but these films are undoubtedly good. Hitchcock was regarded as a master, he is often neglected, comparison of production, the style is fixed, is probably Lumet's limitations, but I still Lumet grievance. Who bought a home on film creation works in the United States, it is a pity that English, lazy I still will put on the shelf.
I love those who do not show off the lens of the director, even if I teach audio-visual, but do not think that audio-visual should be placed above the film, the film is still moving me those characters and stories. So I love Billy Wilde, I love Sidney lumet. Most of the enclosed space is the scene of studio Lumet's studio, but he always prefers to use even short focus wide-angle lens, especially the "Orient Express", if not considering the light, three foot position and space depth background that really makes people think a real. So is the "Twelve Angry Men", using live scene very well, but he is not very restrained, the excessive use of "impossible shots", get consensus only at the end of twelve jurors picked up one by one, hung in the closet coat slowly out of the lens with dressing cabinet a few suits the prospect of jury they are leaving, finally leaving Henry Fonda picked up is still lying in the last like a stubborn choked the suit on the table, put him on, this is the understanding and support between men.
He was restrained, even if the opening second is through the lens space and the atmosphere design of long lens typical account court, until out of the case is still the core of the film court. But as the opening is very suitable for the era, which has no feelings of infatuation to mirror director long, compared with Ocean Wells's "touch of evil", this scene actually has been quite restrained.
He was restrained, he did not because the single space added in the trial court, witnesses the flashback or reproduce the scene. For most of the directors, such a structure is always inevitable, even though I, although we all understand the interest and charm of a single space, but no confidence or ability to truly achieve such a perfect.
He was restrained, he did not take Henry Fonda design into absolute hero, he is just a lot of sanity, the testimony of witnesses of the confusion is gradually put forward by other jurors, everyone to put forward their own personal experience and observation questions, such as poor background, people questioned the holding spring knife method, the old man questioned the witness of vision. Throughout the discussion, a juror number is outside the role of internal organizer, Fonda organizer, only this.
He was restrained, even his warmth. At the end of the jurors out of court, the rain has stopped, summer evening and the sky, as the first man to supporters Fonda, two people for each name, then separated from.
He was restrained, he did not go to revisit the superfluous case is non truth, that has nothing to do with the story of the core, the core of the story is just a boy of guilty or not guilty.
A building is successful, the development of drama is successful, but the control in restraint extremely in the home.
Study and drama director, "Twelve Angry Men" is absolutely worth repeatedly fine works.
Once again, he to me movie ideas and life beliefs are deeply influenced, but the master.
I love this summer, you can see a good movie, you can write, you can look at their own rational and restrained.
